Media Sosial Dan Transformasi Dakwah

(Analisis Intermedialitas Pada Konten Kajian Gus Baha)

Authors

Hasan Labiqul Aqil Institut Pesantren Mathali’ul Falah Pati, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/jik.2025.15.1.43-54

Keywords:

Intermedialitas, Dakwah Gus Baha, Media Sosial

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to highlight the concept of intermediality as an analytical framework for understanding how Gus Baha's da'wah messages adapt and interact in the digital age. Intermediality offers a relevant perspective in exploring the complexity and dynamics of media in contemporary culture, particularly in the context of the transformation of da'wah on social media. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis methods to explore how Gus Baha's study content interacts with audiences through social media dynamics. Intermediality in Gus Baha's da'wah includes the use of various media that influence each other. Initially, his da'wah consisted only of audio recordings, then uploaded to YouTube with additional visuals. Klaus Bruhn Jensen identifies three concepts of intermediality: discursive, material, and institutional. Rajewsky offers three forms of intermediality: media transposition, media combination, and intermedial reference. This analysis shows how Gus Baha's preaching utilizes digital media to convey religious messages effectively, creating adaptive and innovative communication in a modern context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Budiawan, and Satya Limanta. “Intermedialitas Dan Politik Identitas Di Era Digital: Sebuah Pengantar.” In Intermedialitas Dan Politik Identitas Di Era Digital, edited by Budiawan and Satya Limanta, vii–xxiii. Yogyakarta: Ombak, 2021.

Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage publications, 2016.

Faizin, Muhammad. “Gus Baha Jadi Da’i Terpopuler Di Media Sosial.” NU Online, 2022. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/gus-baha-jadi-Da’i-terpopuler-di-media-sosial-YSjG6.

Fiske, John. Television Culture. UK: Methuen, 2010.

Herkman, Juha. “Convergence or Intermediality? Finnish Political Communication in the New Media Age.” Convergence 18, no. 4 (2012): 369–84.

———. “Introduction: Intermediality as a Theory and Methodology.” In Intermediality and Media Change, 10–27. Tampere: University of Tampere, 2012.

Ipang Wahid Stratejik. “Ulama Paling Disukai Publik,” 2023. https://www.ipangwahidstratejik.com/.

Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. “Intermediality.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, 1–12. Wiley Online Library, 2016.

Musthofa, Qowim. “Profil KH. Bahaudin Nur Salim (Gus Baha) Dan Pengaruhnya Pada Generasi Milenial.” Musala: Jurnal Pesantren Dan Kebudayaan Islam Nusantara 1, no. 1 (2022): 79–90.

Rajewsky, Irina O. “Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality.” Intermédialités, no. 6 (2005): 43–64.

Rippl, Gabriele. Handbook of Intermediality: Literature–Image–Sound–Music. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2015.

Shihab, Najwa. “Lebih Dekat Dengan Gus Baha.” Indonesia: Najwa Shihab, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDspKy-JHNU.

Zuhri, Achmad Muhibin. Beragama Di Ruang Digital; Konfigurasi Ideologi Dan Ekspresi Keberagamaan Masyarakat Virtual. Lamongan: Nawa Litera Publishing, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

Hasan Labiqul Aqil. (2025). Media Sosial Dan Transformasi Dakwah : (Analisis Intermedialitas Pada Konten Kajian Gus Baha) . Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.15642/jik.2025.15.1.43-54